![]() ![]() ![]() Later retirements include the Marshall plant in Catawba County (2033) and Belews Creek in Stokes county (2035-36) that could be subject to the new rules.Įrin Culbert, a Duke Energy spokeswoman, told Policy Watch via email that the utility has already implemented technology to help it meet the rule requirements. “This way, EPA would ensure that dischargers would not benefit from less stringent limitations based on closure by a certain date if that closure does not occur,” the rules read. However, if there is a delay in retiring those coal-fired plants, they could then be subject to the stricter discharge limits, effective the day after the scheduled closure date. Cliffside/Rogers, Cleveland/Rutherford counties, 2026. ![]() (Map: Duke Energy)ĭuke plans to retire four of its six remaining coal-fired power plants by the EPA deadlines, according to the Carbon Plan, approved late last year by the NC Utilities Commission: Duke Energy’s remaining coal-fired electric plants: Rogers, west of Shelby Allen, near Gastonia Marshall, on Lake Norman Belews Creek in Stokes County and Roxboro and Mayo, both in Person County. The EPA said this “flexible compliance pathway” would allow “early adopters” to avoid spending significant sums on upgrades when the plants will be retired soon, anyway. That’s because facilities that stop burning coal by 20 could comply with earlier, less stringent rules, enacted under the Obama and Trump administrations. The EPA has proposed new and stricter limits on toxic contaminants that utilities can discharge from their coal-fired power plants and coal ash landfills - but it’s still unclear how the rules would affect Duke Energy’s facilities in North Carolina. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |